Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber, Argyle Road, Sevenoaks

Contact: Democratic Services 01732 227165  Email: democratic.services@sevenoaks.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

42.

Ruling by the Chairman regarding Urgent Matters

Minutes:

In accordance with Section 100B (4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the Chairman advised the Committee that he had agreed to accept an urgent matter – “18/03506/AGRNOT Land North of Oakenden Farm, Oakenden Lane, Chiddingstone Hoath TN8 7DE” (Minute 51 below) as a prior notification application had been submitted and such applications had to be determined within a given timescale or they benefited from automatic permissions. The applications expired on 14 December 2018 and the next meeting of Development Control was not until 17 January 2018.

43.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 68 KB

To approve the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 15 November 2018 as a correct record.

 

Minutes:

Resolved:  That the minutes of the Development Control Committee held on 15 November 2018 be approved and signed as a correct record. 

44.

Declarations of Interest or Predetermination

Including any interests not already registered

Minutes:

Councillor Reay declared that for Minute 46 – 18/03413/HOUSE – 24 Dynes Road, Kemsing, Sevenoaks TN15 6RA he was the applicant for the item and would not take part in the debate or voting thereon.

 

Councillor McArthur declared that for Minute 47 – 18/00690/FUL – Swan Inn, Swan Lane, Edenbridge TN8 6BA she had previously considered the matter when it was discussed by Edenbridge Town Council, but that she remained open minded.

 

Councillor Raikes declared that for Minute 48 – 18/02753/FUL – 18 St Botolphs Road, Sevenoaks TN13 3AQ he had previously considered the matter when it was discussed by Sevenoaks Town Council, but that he remained open minded.

 

Councillor Coleman declared that for Minute 51 – 18/03506/ARGNOT Land North of Okdenden Farm, Oakenden Lane, Chiddingstone Hoath TN8 7DE she would be speaking on the item as the local Member and would not take part in the debate or voting thereon.

45.

Declarations of Lobbying

Minutes:

All Councillors except Ball, Halford and McArthur declared that they had been lobbied in respect of Minute 47 18/02753/FUL - 18 St Botolphs Road, Sevenoaks TN13 3AQ

 

All Councillors except Ball, Coleman, McArthur and Purves declared that they had been lobbied in respect of Minute 48 – 71 Newlands Cottages, Stones Cross Road, Crockenhill BR8 8LT.

 

All Councillors except Ball and McArthur declared that they had been lobbied in respect of Minute 49 - 18/02613/HOUSE - Keepers Cottage, Hill Hoath Road, Chiddingstone TN8 7AE.

Unreserved Planning Applications

There were no public speakers against the following items and no Member reserved the item for debate, therefore, in accordance with Part 7.3(e) of the constitution, the following matter was considered without debate:

46.

18/03413/HOUSE - 24 Dynes Road, Kemsing, Sevenoaks TN15 6RA pdf icon PDF 863 KB

Demolition of conservatory and erection of single storey rear and side extension.

Minutes:

The proposal sought planning permission for the demolition of a conservatory and erection of a single storey rear and side extension.

The application had been referred to Development Control Committee as the applicant was an elected ward councillor.

Resolved:  That planning permission be granted subject to the following conditions

 

1)   The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

 

In pursuance of section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

 

2)   The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used on the existing building.

 

To ensure that the appearance of the development is in harmony with the existing character of the area as supported by Policy EN1 of the Sevenoaks Allocations and Development Management Plan.

 

3)   The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 1815/01 and 1 unnumbered 1:250 scaled location plan, 1 unnumbered 1:500 scaled block plan.

 

For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

 

Reserved Planning Applications

The Committee considered the following planning applications

 

47.

18/00690/FUL - Swan Inn, Swan Lane, Edenbridge TN8 6BA pdf icon PDF 1 MB

Development of a 3 storey residential building.

Minutes:

The proposal sought planning permission for the development of a three storey residential building.

 

The application had been referred to the Development Control Committee by Councillors McGregor and Scholey due to concerns relating to loss of amenity and loss of light from overshadowing and noise issues arising from the pub, causing disturbance.

 

 

Members’ attention was brought to the main agenda papers and the late observations sheet.

 

The Committee was addressed by the following speakers:

 

Against the Application:    Stephen Wilson

For the Application:          -

Parish Representatives:     Town Cllr Scholey

Local Member:                  Cllr McGregor

 

Members asked questions of clarification from Officers. An error within the report was noted in paragraph 47 whereby the public house was referred to instead of the application in relation to avoiding adverse effects in habitable rooms. Officers advised that the density target of 40 dwellings per hectare in residential areas was a guideline figure. Acoustic protection had been conditioned to limit noise impact from the public house and main road. Members raised questions about parking provision and the type of electric charging point proposed.

 

It was moved by the Chairman and duly seconded that the recommendation within the report to grant planning permission be approved.

 

Members raised concerns around the design of the proposal. Concerns were raised about its “brick-like” appearance and flat roof which were not considered in keeping with the street scene and were considered detrimental to the appearance of the local area.

 

The motion to grant planning permission was put to the vote and it was lost.

 

It was moved by the Chairman and duly seconded that planning permission be refused on the grounds of the design, scale and massing of the proposal.

 

The motion was put to the vote and it was

 

Resolved: That planning permission be refused on the grounds that the design, scale and massing of the proposed development would create a prominent and incongruous feature within the street scene. The development is contrary to policy SP1 of the Core Strategy, EN1 of the Sevenoaks Allocations and Development Management Plan and the aims and objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework and Edenbridge Design Statement (1998).

 

48.

18/02753/FUL - 18 St Botolphs Road, Sevenoaks TN13 3AQ pdf icon PDF 701 KB

Demolition of the existing building on site, and the erection of two buildings providing 2x4 bed semi detached, and 3x3 bed terraced houses with associated parking and waste storage.

Minutes:

The proposal sought permission for the demolition of the existing building on site, and the erection of two buildings providing 2x4 bed semi-detached, and 3x3 bed terraced houses with associated parking and waste storage.

The application had been referred to the Development Control Committee by Councillor Fleming due to concerns about the proposal being contrary to paragraph 127 of the NPPF with regards to design and appearance and the Sevenoaks Residential Character Area Assessment.

Members’ attention was brought to the main agenda papers and the late observation sheet.

 

The committee was addressed by the following speakers:

 

Against the Application:    Robert Mankiewitz

For the Application:          Duncan Parr

Parish Representatives:    

Local Member:                  Cllr Fleming

 

Members asked questions of clarification from Officers. Members were advised that the “missing documents” referred to in the public comments were not required for the validation process and the plan inaccuracies related to a boundary dispute between the applicant and a neighbour. It was confirmed that the Vine Conservation Area was up to and including 28 St Botolphs Road.

 

It was moved by the Chairman and duly seconded that the recommendations within the report be agreed.

 

Discussions took place around the proposal’s relation to the conservation area and the street scene in the lower part of St Botolphs Road. It was noted that other similar developments had taken place in this area and the proposal did not appear to be overdeveloped in comparison with neighbouring properties. Some concerns regarding design were raised. Despite the small gardens planned for the site Members noted the proximity to the Vine and other parks within central Sevenoaks. It was noted that obscured windows and roof lighting had been included in the proposal to ensure acceptable light levels and the privacy of neighbouring properties.

 

The motion was put to the vote and it was

 

Resolved:  That planning permission be granted subject to the following conditions

 

1)   The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

In pursuance of section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2)   Prior to the commencement of development, details and samples of the external materials to be used for the development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

To secure a satisfactory appearance in the interests of the visual amenities and character of the locality in accordance with Policy EN1 of the Sevenoaks Allocations and Development Management Plan.

3)   The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and details: FP1 rev A, FP10 rev A, FP11 rev B, FP12 rev A, FP13 rev A, FP14 rev A, FP15 rev B, FP16 rev A, FP17 rev A and FP18 rev A.

For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

4)   No development shall take place until full details, of both hard and soft landscape proposals, including a schedule  ...  view the full minutes text for item 48.

49.

18/02608/HOUSE - 71 Newlands Cottages, Stones Cross Road, Crockenhill BR8 8LT pdf icon PDF 1 MB

Demolition of outbuildings and existing side extension. Proposed double storey side extension and single storey rear extension. Change of car parking from rear to front of property.

Minutes:

The proposal sought permission for the demolition of outbuildings and existing side extension, proposed a double storey side extension and single storey rear extension and a change of car parking from rear to the front of the property.

The application had been referred to the Development Control Committee by Councillor Lindsay who believed that the development did not represent inappropriate development that was harmful to the openness of the Green Belt.

Members’ attention was brought to the main agenda papers.

The Committee was addressed by the following speakers:

 

Against the Application:    -

For the Application:          Lee Palmer

Parish Representatives:     -

Local Member:                  -

 

Members asked questions of clarification from Officers.

 

It was moved by the Chairman and duly seconded that the recommendations within the report be agreed.

 

It was noted that the proposed 80.9% increase in floor area was considered to be overdevelopment in a greenbelt area. Members discussed the street scene and thought that the design and size would be appropriate for the area and in keeping with neighbouring properties. The proposal was considered to be against policy which Members weighted against the importance of good design and continued use of existing materials.

 

The motion to refuse planning permission was put to the vote and it was lost.

 

It was moved by the Chairman and duly seconded that planning permission be granted, subject to conditions to limit further development and protect trees and landscaping with formal wording delegated to the Chief Planning Officer.

 

Resolved: That

a)     planning permission be granted subject to outbuildings to be demolished prior to development and conditions to be included to limit further development by removing permitted development rights B, D and E and to protect trees and landscaping; and

b)     the Chief Planning Officer be delegated authority to draft the formal wording for the decision notice in line with (a) above.

50.

18/02613/HOUSE - Keepers Cottage, Hill Hoath Road, Chiddingstone TN8 7AE pdf icon PDF 624 KB

Alterations to existing dwelling including rear single storey and part two storey extension, new bay window on front elevation.

Minutes:

The proposal sought permission for alterations to an existing dwelling including rear single storey and part two storey extension and a new bay window on the front elevation.

The application had been referred to Development Control Committee by Councillor Coleman to consider the impact upon the openness of the Green Belt and the level of development permitted without requiring planning permission.

Members’ attention was brought to the main agenda papers and the late observation sheets.

 

Against the Application:    -

For the Application:          Roland Foord

Parish Representatives:     -

Local Member:                  -

 

Members asked questions of clarification from officers and the speakers. The size of the garage was confirmed to be 41 square meters. Not including the garage, the proposal would increase the size of the property by 61%. Officers clarified the scope of the Lawful Development Certificate held for the property which would permit the ground floor proposal to be built without planning permission. Members were advised that approving this proposal would remove the applicant’s permitted development rights for further development.

 

It was moved by the Chairman and duly seconded that the recommendations within the report be agreed.

 

Members considered the proposal’s setting within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). The application was considered to be well designed and congruous with the wider area. If refused, concerns were expressed around the applicant producing a less attractive and fitting design which they would not be required to apply for planning permission for if in line with the Lawful Development Certificate. Members considered the support from the Parish Council for the application It was noted that the development would only constitute a 20% increase on current permitted building rights.

 

The motion to refuse planning permission was put to the vote and it was lost.

 

It was moved by the Chairman and duly seconded that planning permission be granted subject to conditions to limit further development with formal wording delegated to the Chief Planning Officer.

 

Resolved: That

Resolved: That planning permission be granted subject to the following conditions

 

a)     Thedevelopment hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

 

In pursuance of section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

b)     The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used on the existing building.

To maintain the integrity and character of the building as supported by the NPPF and policy EN1 of Sevenoaks District Councils Allocations and Development Management Plan.

 

c)     The garage and summer house and all existing outbuildings, except those shown on plan 000.10.01.Pln. 020/A shall be demolished prior to development being carried out on the land.

As the removal of these structures contributes to the very special circumstances in this case that clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and to mitigate further harm assupported by the National Planning Policy Framework and policy GB3 of Sevenoaks District Councils Allocations and Development Management Plan.

 

d)     Notwithstanding  ...  view the full minutes text for item 50.

At 9.20 p.m. the Chairman adjourned the Committee for the convenience of Members and Officers. The meeting resumed at 9.26 p.m.

51.

18/03506/AGRNOT Land North of Oakenden Farm, Oakenden Lane, Chiddingstone Hoath TN8 7DE pdf icon PDF 572 KB

Agricultural store.

Minutes:

In accordance with Section 100B (4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the Chairman had agreed to accept this report as an urgent matter.

 

The Agricultural Notification had been called to the Development Control Committee by Councillor Coleman on the grounds that the building may not have been reasonably necessary for the purposes of the agricultural unit and may have not been sited appropriately.

 

Members’ attention was brought to the main agenda papers and the late observations sheet.

 

The Committee was addressed by the following speakers:

 

Against the Application:    -

For the Application:          -

Parish Representatives:     Parish Cllr Mitzi Quirk

Local Member:                  Cllr Coleman

 

(Having spoken as the local Member Cllr Coleman remained in the Chamber but did not take part in the debate or voting thereon.)

 

Members asked questions of clarification from the Officers. It was queried whether the proposed agricultural store could be sited elsewhere on the land and Members were advised that the applicant had been asked to consider alternative siting however had not found an alternative.

 

It was moved by the Chairman and duly seconded that the recommendations within the report be agreed.

 

The motion was put to the vote and it was

 

Resolved:  That prior approval was not required.

 

 

Back to top