7.01    Objection to TPO/01/2011: Crispins, The Street, Horton Kirby, South Darenth

The Committee noted that the Order related to an individual Ash tree located within the garden of Crispins, The Street, Horton Kirby. The report advised that the owner of the property had stated within her objection that the tree was overbearing. The owners also stated that the tree caused all surrounding buildings and furniture to be coated in a green residue that required constant attention.

Members were advised that Its removal would be very much noticed and would have a negative affect on the local landscape. Any problem of restriction of light and overhanging branches could be overcome by sensibly pruning the canopy of this tree.

The Local Member was concerned by its proximity to the house given its size. He informed the Committee that the house predated the tree. The Arboricultural and Landscape Officer told Members that there was potential for pruning, possibly of 30%, which could last 5 or 6 years. He was prepared to give free advice on the matter to the owners of the property.

       Resolved:           That the Tree Preservation Order No. 1 of 2011 be confirmed without amendments.

Informatives

The Arboricultural and Landcape Officer is invited to discuss acceptable pruning of the tree with the property owner.

7.02    Objection to TPO/206/2011: 14 Woodlands Rise, Swanley

The committee noted that the order related to an individual oak tree located within the garden of 14 Woodlands Rise, Swanley. The report advised that an objection was received on the grounds that this tree had damaged the boundary wall between two properties damage.

Members were advised that it was beyond dispute that damage had occurred to the boundary wall. No evidence had been provided to prove that the tree was the cause of the damage but given the proximity of the tree to the wall, it was extremely likely. They were also advised that the tree’s removal would be very much noticed and would have a negative affect on the local landscape. Objections could be overcome by the submission of an application to carry out periodic pruning works.

Some Members were concerned by the size of the tree. The Arboricultural and Landscape Officer recommended that it be pruned.

Resolved:      That the Tree Preservation Order No. 6 of 2011 be confirmed without amendments.